Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Navigate WLFW Landscapes
Grasslands and Savannas
Aquatics
Eastern Deciduous Forests
Western Landscapes
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
Navigate Target Species
American Black Duck
Blanding's Turtle
Bog turtle
Colorado River Mussels
Conasauga River Aquatic Species
Eastern Hellbender
Golden-Winged Warbler
Gopher Tortoise
Lesser Prairie-Chicken
Monarch Butterfly
Northern Bobwhite, Grasslands & Savannas
Northeast Turtles
Sage Grouse
Shorebirds of Louisiana Wetlands
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher
Yazoo Darter
Companion Sites
Applcc
Conservation Design
Conservation Planning Atlas
Conservation Planning and GIS Resources
Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture
Ecosystem Benefits and Risks
Energy
Nature and Society
Imperiled Aquatic Species for the UTRB
North Atlantic LCC
Science Applications Online Learning
Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership
Tennessee River Basin
Whitewater to Bluewater
Skip to content.
|
Skip to navigation
Search Site
only in current section
Advanced Search…
Sections
Home
About
Catalog: How to use the Landscape Partnership
Services
Video: Intro to the Landscape Partnership Workspaces
Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW) Workspaces
FAQs
Video: Welcome to the Landscape Partnership
A Video Collection on LP Tools
LP Members
Eastern Brook Trout
Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership SARP
Working Lands for Wildlife
Home
About
Landscapes & Wildlife
Landowner Information
Learning & Tech Transfer
Issues
News & Announcements
Workspace
Workspaces
Organizations Search
Our Community
Expertise Search
Voices from the Community
Community Map
How To Use The LP Expertise Search
WLFW
Home
About
LP Members
Working Lands for Wildlife
Home
About
Our Partners and Organizations
Our Community and Expertise Search
Where We Work
Landscapes & Wildlife
Landscapes
Wildlife
Landowner Information
Landowner Forums
Landowner Resources
Landowner Feedback
Learning & Tech Transfer
General Resources and Publications
Landscape Partnership Online Learning Network
Webinars & Videos
Apps, Maps, & Data
Training Resources
Issues
The Anchor Approach to Connectivity
Equity & Inclusion
Wildland Fire
Eastern Deciduous Forest Health
Southeast FireMap
News & Announcements
Events
WLFW Newsletters
Workspace
Our Community
WLFW
Issues
Resources
Projects
Apps, Maps, & Data
News & Events
Training
Issues
The Anchor Approach to Connectivity
Anchor Resources
WLFW
Wildland Fire
SE FireMap
Equity & Inclusion
Home
Resources
Training
Community Hub
Nature and Society
Climate Context
Ecosystem Benefits & Risks
Energy
Resources
Projects
Project Search
Submit a Project
Products
Science Investments
Chesapeake Bay
Agenda North Atlantic LCC Meeting with USFWS Chesapeake Bay Area Staff
Presentation - Aquatic, Terrestrial and Landscape Conservation Design Tools and Products of the North Atlantic LCC
Presentation - Overview of North Atlantic LCC Approach, Partnership & Products & Some Coastal Stuff
Fact Sheet - The North Atlantic LCC in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Fact Sheet - Science Products from the North Atlantic LCC
Excercise - Using NALCC Conservation Planning Atlas on Data Basin
Landscope Chesapeake Overview
Introduction to Data Basin
Connecticut River Watershed Pilot
About the Pilot
Documents
Connecticut River Pilot Core Team
Aquatic Technical Subteam
Terrestrial and Wetland Technical Subteam
Calendar
Conservation Planning Atlas
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Gopher Tortoise
Apps, Maps, & Data
Literature Gateway: A Systemic Map of Bird-Vegetation Relationships in Eastern and Boreal Forests
Bobscapes
BirdLocale
SE FireMap
Landscape Partnership Spatial Datasets
Aquatic and Freshwater Spatial Data
North Atlantic Spatial Data
Appalchian Boundary and Resource Maps
Regional and National Maps
Zip Area Maps
GIS & Conservation Planning Toolkit
Home
Conservation Planning
Tools & Resources
Planning In Practice
Data
Training
News & Events
Events
Conservation Newsletters
Training
Videos and Webinars
Training Resources Exchange
Landscape Partnership Online Learning Network
Personal tools
Log in
Jump to Child Site
Landscape Partnership
Appalachian Naturescape
Aquatics
BirdLocale
Black Duck
Bobscapes
Bog Turtle
Eastern Deciduous Forests
Eastern Hellbender
Ecosystem Benefits & Risks
Energy
Equity & Inclusion
GIS & Conservation Planning Toolkit
Golden-Winged Warbler
Grasslands and Savannas
Imperiled Aquatic Species Conservation Strategy for the Upper TN River Basin
Nature and Society
Northern Bobwhite Quail
SE FireMap
The Anchor Approach to Connectivity
The Literature Gateway
Western Landscapes
Wildland Fire
Working Lands for Wildlife
You are here:
Home
Info
Modified items
All recently modified items, latest first.
Cinelli, Matthew
Geodiversity Key to Conserving Biodiversity Under Climate Change
The physical factors that create diversity (landform, bedrock, soil and topography), collectively known as geodiversity, might be the key to conserving biodiversity under a changing climate.
Notes from 06-12-2015 Connecticut River Pilot Core Team Meeting
Summary of discussion and outcomes, including maps used to facilitate discussion during the meeting.
Population Performance Criteria to Evaluate Reintroduction and Recovery of Two Endangered Mussel Species, Epioblasma brevidens and Epioblasma capsaeformis
Genetic and demographic modeling of two endangered mussel species, Epioblasma brevidens and E. capsaeformis, in the Clinch River, U.S.A., was conducted to determine quantitative criteria to evaluate performance of extant and reintroduced populations. Reintroduction modelling indicated that the initial population size created during a 5 year build-up phase greatly affected final population size at 25 years, being similar to the population size at the end of the build-up phase, especially when population growth rate was low. Excluding age 0 individuals, age 1 juveniles or recruits on average comprised approximately 11% and 15% of a stable population of each species, respectively. Age-class distribution of a stable or growing population was characterized by multiple cohorts, including juvenile recruits, sub-adults, and adults. Because of current barriers to dispersal and the low dispersal capability of some mussel species, reintroductions will play a prominent role in restoring populations in the United States.
Three new darter species of the Etheostoma percnurum species complex (Percidae, subgenus Catonotus) from the Tennessee and Cumberland River Drainages
The federally endangered Duskytail Darter, Etheostoma percnurum Jenkins, is known from only six highly disjunct populations in the Tennessee and Cumberland river drainages of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia. Only four are extant. Variation in morphology including meristics, morphometrics, and pigmentation was examined among the four extant populations and limited specimens from the two extirpated populations (Abrams Creek and South Fork Holston River). Analyses of these data found each of the extant populations is morphologically diagnosable. The few specimens avail- able from Abrams Creek and South Fork Holston River prevented thorough assessment of variation, and these were grouped with their closest geographic counterparts, Citico Creek, and Little River, respectively. Three new morphologi- cally diagnosable species are described: E. sitikuense, the Citico Darter, from Citico Creek, Abrams Creek, and Tellico River (Tennessee River system); E. marmorpinnum, the Marbled Darter, from the Little River and South Fork Holston River (Tennessee River system); and E. lemniscatum, the Tuxedo Darter, from the Big South Fork (Cumberland River system). Each species warrants federal protection as an endangered species.
Toward rigorous use of expert knowledge in ecological research
Practicing ecologists who excel at their work (‘‘experts’’) hold a wealth of knowledge. This knowledge offers a wide range of opportunities for application in ecological research and natural resource decision-making. While experts are often consulted ad-hoc, their contributions are not widely acknowledged. These informal applications of expert knowledge lead to concerns about a lack of transparency and repeatability, causing distrust of this knowledge source in the scientific community. Here, we address these concerns with an exploration of the diversity of expert knowledge and of rigorous methods in its use. The effective use of expert knowledge hinges on an awareness of the spectrum of experts and their expertise, which varies by breadth of perspective and critical assessment. Also, experts express their knowledge in different forms depending on the degree of contextualization with other information. Careful matching of experts to application is therefore essential and has to go beyond a simple fitting of the expert to the knowledge domain. The standards for the collection and use of expert knowledge should be as rigorous as for empirical data. This involves knowing when it is appropriate to use expert knowledge and how to identify and select suitable experts. Further, it requires a careful plan for the collection, analysis and validation of the knowledge. The knowledge held by expert practitioners is too valuable to be ignored. But only when thorough methods are applied, can the application of expert knowledge be as valid as the use of empirical data. The responsibility for the effective and rigorous use of expert knowledge lies with the researchers.
Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting
A vast number of prioritization schemes have been developed to help conservation navigate tough decisions about the allocation of finite resources. However, the application of quantitative approaches to setting priorities in conservation frequently includes mistakes that can undermine their authors’ intention to be more rigorous and scientific in the way priorities are established and resources allocated. Drawing on well-established principles of decision science, we highlight 6 mistakes commonly associated with setting priorities for conservation: not acknowledging conservation plans are prioritizations; trying to solve an ill- defined problem; not prioritizing actions; arbitrariness; hidden value judgments; and not acknowledging risk of failure. We explain these mistakes and offer a path to help conservation planners avoid making the same mistakes in future prioritizations.
Conservation in the face of climate change: The roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty
The broad physical and biological principles behind climate change and its potential large scale ecological impacts on biota are fairly well understood, although likely responses of biotic communities at fine spatio-temporal scales are not, limiting the ability of conservation programs to respond effectively to climate change outside the range of human experience. Much of the climate debate has focused on attempts to resolve key uncertainties in a hypothesis-testing framework. However, conservation decisions cannot await resolution of these scientific issues and instead must proceed in the face of uncertainty. We suggest that conservation should precede in an adaptive management framework, in which decisions are guided by predictions under multiple, plausible hypotheses about climate impacts. Under this plan, monitoring is used to evaluate the response of the system to climate drivers, and management actions (perhaps experimental) are used to confront testable predictions with data, in turn providing feedback for future decision making. We illustrate these principles with the problem of mitigating the effects of climate change on terrestrial bird communities in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA.
Plan for the Population Restoration and Conservation of Imperiled Freshwater Mollusks of the Cumberland Region
The goal of this Plan is to provide a framework for the restoration of freshwater mollusk resources and their ecological functions to appropriate reaches of the Cumberlandian Region through the reintroduction, augmentation (R/A) and controlled propagation of priority mollusks. The Plan prioritizes propagation and R/A activities for Region mollusks and provides guidelines for resource managers and recovery partners. The Plan is not a legal document and is not intended to replace or supersede published recovery plans for listed mollusks.
Moreweb, Mark
Agenda: Connecticut River Pilot Core Team Meeting 06-12-2015
Agenda for June 2015 Core Team Meeting
Partnership benefits two Kentucky landscapes
The Forecastle Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to preserving areas of abundant biodiversity, today begins a new charitable partnership with The Nature Conservancy’s Kentucky Chapter.
Maryland DNR Helps Fund New Stream Restoration Monitoring Program
Efforts to produce measurable water quality data and results.
Pilgrim, Jay
Connecticut River Pilot Core Team Meeting 06-12-2015
Agenda, notes, and associated files for the June CT Pilot Meeting
Taylor, Maxwell
Map of Listed, Proposed, and Candidate Fish and Mussels in the UTRB
Map depicting the number of listed, proposed, and candidate fish and mussel species within each 12-digit HUC within the Upper Tennessee River Basin. Occurrences include extant and historical records. Areas within the UTRB boundary not shaded by a color in the key have no records of imperiled fish and mussel species occurrences.
Map of Listed, Proposed, and Candidate Mussels in the UTRB
Map depicting the number of listed, proposed, and candidate mussel species within each 12-digit HUC within the Upper Tennessee River Basin. Occurrences include extant and historical records. Areas within the UTRB boundary not shaded by a color in the key have no records of imperiled mussel species occurrences.
Marxan Training Resources
Presentations, agendas, and data for Marxan training session on February 3-4, 2015 at NCTC in Shepherdstown, West Virginia.
Wynn, Anne
« Previous 20 items
Next 20 items »
1
...
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
...
670