Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / OLD National Capital Region's Biennial Spotlight on National Park Resources / Spotlight Posters on National Park Resources

Spotlight Posters on National Park Resources

by Web Editor last modified May 10, 2016 05:55 PM

Fact Sheet: Stream Classification

by Matthew Cimitile last modified May 25, 2017 12:39 PM
Contributors: cimitile
Developing consistent region-wide information to ensure enough water for people and wildlife.
Developing consistent region-wide information to ensure enough water for people and wildlife.

Publication Date: 2017

DOWNLOAD FILE — PDF document, 1,645 kB (1,685,263 bytes)

Species and Habitat Vulnerability Assessments of Appalachian Species and Habitats

by Matthew Cimitile last modified Apr 28, 2017 08:15 AM
Future climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies will be dependent on the best available projections of how the regional climate will change and the impacts those changes will have on the region’s natural and cultural resources. Understanding the vulnerability of various species and habitats to climate change within the Appalachian LCC is of critical importance for making effective conservation decisions. The AppLCC funded a Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment research project that addresses several factors: 1) how the Cooperative should acquire information about the climate vulnerability of Appalachian species and habitats to develop vulnerability assessments for a suite of key species and habitats to share with partners; 2) compilation of known vulnerability assessments of species and habitats, and 3) new climate change vulnerability assessments of selected species and habitats in the AppLCC region.

Species and Habitat Vulnerability Assessments of Appalachian Species and Habitats - Read More…

Southern Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments Excel Spreadsheet

by Web Editor last modified Apr 23, 2017 04:10 PM
Contributors: AppLCC
Downloadable spreadsheet to accommodate the Cumberland - Southern Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments.
Southern Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments Excel Spreadsheet
Downloadable spreadsheet to accommodate the Cumberland - Southern Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments.

DOWNLOAD FILE — application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet, 4,071 kB (4,169,433 bytes)

Conservation Challenge

by Jean Brennan last modified Jul 18, 2016 09:43 AM
Water withdrawals from human activities can alter surface water resources and impact aquatic habitats and organisms. The most commonly studied sources of flow alterations are typically dams and water withdrawals associated with agricultural operations and industrial uses. However, the emergence of hydraulic fracturing has led to the rapid expansion of natural gas drilling and has made it a key source in altering surface water resources in the Marcellus Shale region.

from: Brian Buchanan et al., 2015

The Appalachian LCC geography covers the entire Marcellus Shale region in the Central Appalachians, including portions of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia. Because the LCC has identified energy development as a key driver of landscape change, the Cornell research area focused on the Marcellus Shale region and watersheds that extend beyond the Appalachian LCC borders.

Hydraulic fracturing is a process of drilling and injecting large quantities of water (often obtained from nearby streams) underground to break apart shale rocks and release natural gas. This energy process has rapidly expanded in Pennsylvania and West Virginia and could likely spread into Ohio and New York.

The Marcellus Shale region is characterized by geologic, topographic, and climatic variation that has created a variety of stream habitats and aquatic communities. This variety has led to considerable aquatic biodiversity. For example, field surveys summarized in this study suggest the region is home to more than 220 different fish species, including some threatened and locally endangered species. Furthermore, nearly 135,000 streams drain into three major economically and ecologically important watersheds: the Susquehanna, Ohio, and Delaware River basins.

The abundant biodiversity along with the many societal benefits provided by streams in the region (from energy to recreational) highlight the need for achieving sustainable river and stream flows that balance human/energy needs with healthy ecosystems.

Environmental Flow Analysis for the Marcellus Shale Region PDF

by Web Editor last modified Jul 14, 2016 09:17 AM
Contributors: Brian Buchanan, Ryan McManamay, Dan Auerbach, Daniel Fuka, M.T. Walter
A technical report submitted to the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative in completion of grant# 2012-03 - Final Report
Environmental Flow Analysis for the Marcellus Shale Region PDF
A technical report submitted to the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative in completion of grant# 2012-03 - Final Report

Publication Date: 2015

DOWNLOAD FILE — PDF document, 26,856 kB (27,501,462 bytes)

Environmental Flows from Water Withdrawals in the Marcellus Shale Region

by Matthew Cimitile last modified Jul 13, 2016 11:04 AM
The Appalachian LCC collaborated with Cornell University to study the environmental impacts of water withdrawals in the Central Appalachian region. The rivers and streams of the Central Appalachians are home to more than 200 species of fish and other aquatic life. They also provide a reliable source of drinking water, recreational opportunities and associated economic benefits to people living in large cities and surrounding communities. This research looks at how the region’s surface freshwater supply – and the health of natural systems delivering this resource – have been impacted and may be altered in the coming years under increasing water withdrawals. It focuses on the Marcellus Shale region in the Central Appalachians, including portions of NY, PA, OH, MD, WV and VA.

Environmental Flows from Water Withdrawals in the Marcellus Shale Region - Read More…

Video Update: Aquatic Ecological Flows Research

by Matthew Cimitile last modified Jun 21, 2016 10:22 AM
This presentation from Dr. Todd Walter of Cornell University provides an update to the Steering Committee on this Appalachian LCC funded research project. The Aquatic Ecological Flows project is providing a report assessing availability of hydrologic and ecological flow model(s) suitable for the region, an assessment of available ecological data to inform the ecological flow model(s), the application of the model(s) to anticipate how changes in stream flow will affect environmental conditions, and a report that forecasts changes in hydrology and associated biological responses to critical watersheds from different water resource development scenarios.

You can also watch this video on our Vimeo Channel.

Data Access

by Jean Brennan last modified Jun 21, 2016 10:22 AM
Phase I of this project involved an inventory of flow models and the underlying, or potential, data sources from instream monitoring networks.

The inventory helped to determine what ecological flow models - that can predict both low and high flows - were in use or were applicable to the Marcellus Shale region and recommended suitable model(s) for instream flow predictions both dependent and independent of ecological/biological data. The deliverables for Phase 1 of this project included a report that assessed the availability of hydrologic and ecological flow models suitable for the Marcellus Shale region and a georeferenced summary of the adequacy of available ecological data to inform ecological flow model(s) for streams within the Marcellus Shale region. The georeferenced summary assessment is available as an Access database.

The database consists of five main tables. These tables include:

  • tbl_datasets_marcellus: provides information on original dataset and states represented for each dataset
  • tbl_originators_marcellus: provides information on data collecting agency and states represented for each originator
  • tbl_fish_species_lookup_marcellus: provides unique ids (maris_fishspecies_id), common names and scientific names at family, genus and species level
  • tbl_loc_info_marcellus: provides unique ids for collection sites (originator_station_id) and associated site information, including latitude and longitude, which can be used to link location information to fish collection information. Additional queries were run to create refined location tables
      • tbl_location_marcellus_state_stream_sites: all stream fish collection sites within states or ecoregions that overlap the Marcellus boundary
      • tbl_location_marcellus_all_sites: all fish collection sites within the Marcellus boundary
  • tbl_fish_info_marcellus: provides unique ids for each collection event (originator_sample_id) which can be used to link collection information (date, collection methods, effort, species, abundance) with site information.

 

Information from the last three tables (tbl_fish_species_lookup_marcellus, tbl_location_info_marcellus, tbl_fish_info_marcellus) can be combined based on unique ids and queried based on criteria in the tables (i.e. collection method, targeted sampling verses community sampling, etc.) to develop fish datasets for different analyses in the future.

In addition, two shapefiles have been created from the database. These shapefiles display the location of the sampling points. If a user wants to view the results of a sampling station, they will need to find the station using the shapefile and then refer to the results table. This process can be completed manually by looking up the information in Access or a join can be performed in ArcGIS to connect these tables so all of the information appears in one attribute table.

Key Findings & Management Recommendations

by Jean Brennan last modified Jun 21, 2016 10:22 AM
The Appalachian LCC-funded study is the first region-wide assessment to document “flow-ecology” relationships – showing connections between observed impacts under current water withdrawal standards (based on daily water gauge data collected over the last 15 years and fish surveys) and the decline in freshwater fish communities.

Based on the assessed relationships and factors such as season, stream size, and projected expansion of natural gas development in the region, scientists developed models showing how water withdrawals impact sustainability of aquatic ecosystems. Cornell researchers also applied a model to vary water withdrawal scenarios – for example from current standards to a more seasonally variable scenario – that provided critical information on how flow regimes can be modified to achieve a balance in meeting both human/energy water needs and those required to maintain healthy ecosystems and diversity.

Key findings and recommendations from the research include:

  • Flow-ecology relationships indicate fish are sensitive not only to changes in low flows, but also to changes in a variety of flow components (season, median, and high flows). This has important implications for setting sustainable flow standards and designing monitoring campaigns.
  • A considerable number of streams are at high risk of flow alteration due to withdrawals during the summer and fall seasons – especially smaller streams in the southwestern (western portions of Ohio River Basin) and northern (headwaters of the Upper Susquehanna and Hudson River Basins) sections of the region.
  • Though these high-risk streams are individually small, combined they drain the majority of the study region.
  • Fixed minimum aquatic flow standards that do not consider seasonal changes in flows and throughout the year may not be adequate to sustain fish populations and aquatic biodiversity.
  • But a balance can be realized if flow standards due to water withdrawal regulations vary with stream size and season and thus provide the necessary balance between human needs and flows needed to sustain fish and aquatic ecosystems.

Final Report: Environmental Flow Analysis for the Marcellus Shale Region

by Brian Buchanan, Ryan McManamay, Dan Auerbach, Daniel Fuka, M.T. Walter — last modified Jun 21, 2016 10:22 AM

 

Download the PDF

or read it online:

Bat Summary for Appalachian LCC Cave/Karst Study

by Jessica Rhodes last modified Mar 10, 2016 03:55 PM
Contributors: David Culver, Mary Christman, Daniel Doctor, Matthew Niemiller, David Weary, John Young, Kirk Zigler
This document contains a list of the bat species that regularly use caves and mines in the Appalachian LCC region, federal status of these species, and sources of bat data.
This document contains a list of the bat species that regularly use caves and mines in the Appalachian LCC region, federal status of these species, and sources of bat data.

Publication Date: 2016

DOWNLOAD FILE — application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document, 139 kB (142,974 bytes)

Guidelines for Using the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index

by Lesley Sneddon — last modified Mar 10, 2016 12:26 PM
Contributors: Bruce E. Young, Elizabeth Byers, Geoff Hammerson, Anne Frances, Leah Oliver,, Amanda Treher
Motivated by the need to rapidly assess the vulnerability of species to climate change, NatureServe developed a Climate Change Vulnerability Index. The Index uses a scoring system that integrates a species’ predicted exposure to climate change within an area and three sets of factors associated with climate change sensitivity, each supported by published studies: 1) indirect exposure to climate change, 2) species-specific sensitivity and adaptive capacity factors and 3) documented response to climate change. Our primary goal for the Index is to provide valuable input for key planning documents, such as revisions of state wildlife action plans, to allow consideration of climate change impacts together with other stressors. We also hope this tool will help land managers develop and prioritize strategies for climate change adaptation that lead to actions that increase the resilience of species to climate change.
Motivated by the need to rapidly assess the vulnerability of species to climate change, NatureServe developed a Climate Change Vulnerability Index. The Index uses a scoring system that integrates a species’ predicted exposure to climate change within an area and three sets of factors associated with climate change sensitivity, each supported by published studies: 1) indirect exposure to climate change, 2) species-specific sensitivity and adaptive capacity factors and 3) documented response to climate change. Our primary goal for the Index is to provide valuable input for key planning documents, such as revisions of state wildlife action plans, to allow consideration of climate change impacts together with other stressors. We also hope this tool will help land managers develop and prioritize strategies for climate change adaptation that lead to actions that increase the resilience of species to climate change.

Publication Date: 2016

DOWNLOAD FILE — PDF document, 1,937 kB (1,983,987 bytes)

County Distribution of Assessed Species

by Matthew Cimitile last modified Mar 10, 2016 12:23 PM
County distribution for the climate change vulnerability of 41 newly assessed species is available for download. The entire package is available at the link provided.

County Distribution of Assessed Species - Read More…

Previous Climate Assessments on 700 Species

by Matthew Cimitile last modified Mar 10, 2016 12:21 PM
Find here Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments from previous research. Each excel file contains a subset of data from a compilation of climate change vulnerability scores for 700 species in the Appalachian LCC.

The subregions include:


There are four worksheets within each excel file:

  • Assessment worksheets – Includes species information (common name, scientific name, taxonomic information, and habitat categories) and climate change vulnerability scores as well as link to NatureServe Explorer for more information. (Due to file size, the Cumberland - Southern Appalachian subregion worksheet was divided into three separate worksheets. One worksheet contains the links to NatureServe Explorer for each species.)
  • Map worksheets – Overview map of all subregions as well as maps specific to the subregion of interest.
  • Instruction worksheets – Contains background information and explains data found in the Assessment worksheets.
  • Reference worksheets – Includes citations for references used as well as links to selected publications.

The vulnerability ranks for each state as well as the subregion as a whole are recorded in the spreadsheet. The vulnerability ranks are as follows; extremely vulnerable (EV), highly vulnerable (HV), moderately vulnerable (MV), presumed stable (PS), and increase likely (IL). Each assessment is annotated with the source of the vulnerability assessment using numerical superscripts. More information about the vulnerability scores and sources is available on the Information tab on the excel spreadsheet available for each subregion.

Final Report: Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments in the Appalachian LCC

by NatureServe — last modified Mar 10, 2016 12:04 PM
Contributors: NatureServe
The Appalachian LCC tasked NatureServe with a two-phase project that explores the understanding of climate change in the Appalachian landscape. The first phase focused on assembling a panel of experts to provide guidance on a) prioritizing species and habitats to assess for vulnerability to climate change; b) selecting approaches to conduct vulnerability assessments, and c) identifying appropriate climate data to use in the assessments. Guided by the recommendations of the Panel, Phase II analyzes the results of 700 existing species assessments, and conducts vulnerability analyses on 41 additional species and 3 habitats. We used the recommendations of the Expert Panel, as well as the existing compilation to guide our recommended list of additional species and habitats to be assessed in Phase II. Criteria included a focus on the Interior Low Plateau and on plants, neither of which were well represented in existing assessments, as well as species of high conservation significance, keystone or species otherwise important to the habitat, and those of high value as indicators of climate change. This report summarizes Phase II of this effort.
Final Report: Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments in the Appalachian LCC
The Appalachian LCC tasked NatureServe with a two-phase project that explores the understanding of climate change in the Appalachian landscape. The first phase focused on assembling a panel of experts to provide guidance on a) prioritizing species and habitats to assess for vulnerability to climate change; b) selecting approaches to conduct vulnerability assessments, and c) identifying appropriate climate data to use in the assessments. Guided by the recommendations of the Panel, Phase II analyzes the results of 700 existing species assessments, and conducts vulnerability analyses on 41 additional species and 3 habitats. We used the recommendations of the Expert Panel, as well as the existing compilation to guide our recommended list of additional species and habitats to be assessed in Phase II. Criteria included a focus on the Interior Low Plateau and on plants, neither of which were well represented in existing assessments, as well as species of high conservation significance, keystone or species otherwise important to the habitat, and those of high value as indicators of climate change. This report summarizes Phase II of this effort.

Publication Date: 2016

DOWNLOAD FILE — PDF document, 6,666 kB (6,826,008 bytes)

Stream Classification Story Map

by Web Editor last modified Mar 10, 2016 11:09 AM

Image for the Stream Classification Story MapThis study developed a mapped classification system for stream and river systems in the Appalachian LCC region to inform conservation planning for aquatic biodiversity. Stream habitats were classified using six primary attributes: size, gradient, temperature, hydrology, buffering capacity, and confinement. Information on each variable was based on extensive data compiled or modeled. Variable classes were then combined to yield a regional taxonomy.

Access this Story Map that illustrates the mapped classification system for streams and rivers.

Literature Review of Freshwater Classification Frameworks

by The Nature Conservancy — last modified Mar 10, 2016 10:54 AM
Contributors: The Nature Conservancy
Identifying aquatic ecosystems requires a classification of stream and lake features into recognizable categories. Although a number of nationally recognized terrestrial community classifications exist, currently there is no national or international standard for classifying aquatic communities or ecosystems. Despite the lack of a national aquatic community classification, aquatic ecosystem classifications and frameworks have been developed at a variety of spatial scales to reflect the distribution of aquatic biological communities. This report reviews these freshwater classification frameworks, providing detailed analysis and application examples of taxonomic, environmental, and hydrologic classifications in use within the Appalachian region.
Identifying aquatic ecosystems requires a classification of stream and lake features into recognizable categories. Although a number of nationally recognized terrestrial community classifications exist, currently there is no national or international standard for classifying aquatic communities or ecosystems. Despite the lack of a national aquatic community classification, aquatic ecosystem classifications and frameworks have been developed at a variety of spatial scales to reflect the distribution of aquatic biological communities. This report reviews these freshwater classification frameworks, providing detailed analysis and application examples of taxonomic, environmental, and hydrologic classifications in use within the Appalachian region.

Publication Date: 2014

DOWNLOAD FILE — PDF document, 944 kB (966,755 bytes)

Data Access

by Matthew Cimitile last modified Mar 10, 2016 10:53 AM
The entire stream classification dataset is available for download as a zip file.

Included in the download, is a shapefile of all of the stream flow lines within the study area. Information about each of the features is available in the attribute table of the shapefile. An Excel file is included which describes each of the fields in the attribute table. In addition, several layer files are also included: alkalinity classes; confinement classes; gradient classes; hydrologic classes; size classes; temperature classes; and a combination of temperature, gradient, confinement, and size classes. The layer files refer to data within the shapefile, but preserve a pre-defined symbology for users to more easily visualize the data based on certain characteristics.

Data Download Link: http://applcc.s3.amazonaws.com/Aquatic_Classification/FlowlinesData.zip

Previous Habitat Assessments within the Appalachian LCC

by Lesley Sneddon — last modified Feb 12, 2016 10:30 AM
Contributors: Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences and National Wildlife Federation (2012), North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2010), Patricia Butler et al. (2015), Jennifer Costanza et al. (2014)
This spreadsheet provides the results of habitat assessments from five previous research projects. These include two projects in the Central Appalachian and Cumberland - Southern Appalachian portion of the LCC; habitat assessments completed in the North Carolina portion of the Cumberland - Southern Appalachian subregion; habitat assessments in the northeastern portion of the Central Appalachian subregion; and a draft assessment for a habitat in the Interior Low Plateau.
This spreadsheet provides the results of habitat assessments from five previous research projects. These include two projects in the Central Appalachian and Cumberland - Southern Appalachian portion of the LCC; habitat assessments completed in the North Carolina portion of the Cumberland - Southern Appalachian subregion; habitat assessments in the northeastern portion of the Central Appalachian subregion; and a draft assessment for a habitat in the Interior Low Plateau.

DOWNLOAD FILE — application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet, 17 kB (17,709 bytes)