Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home

Search results

RSS Subscribe to an always-updated RSS feed.

279 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type
























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File Troff document CCVA Progress Report
by Matthew Cimitile — published Oct 04, 2013 — filed under:
For Second Quarter of 2013, from NatureServe vendor.
Located in Research / … / Quarterly Reports Folder / Q2 2013
Central Appalachia Prosperity Project
by Matthew Cimitile — published Sep 22, 2016 — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
The Central Appalachia Prosperity Project is part of the Presidential Climate Action Project to develop policy recommendations on climate and energy security, with a focus on what the next President of the United States could accomplish using his or her executive authority. The Central Appalachian Project draws on the input of America's most innovative experts to produce policy and program recommendations that are sufficiently bold to expedite the region's transition to a clean energy economy. An important component of these recommendations has been better coordination of the efforts being made by all levels of government - federal, regional, state and local.
Located in Cultural Resources / Socioeconomics / Socio-economic Projects
File text/texmacs Central Appalachian subregion climate change vulnerability species assessments Excel Spreadsheet
by Lesley Sneddon — published Dec 18, 2015 — last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , ,
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the northern-most portion of the LCC, covering the area from New York south to West Virginia and Virginia, west to Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio. Results included are Byers and Norris 2011 (West Virginia); Furedi et al. 2011 (Pennsylvania), Ring et al. 2013 (New Jersey), Schlesinger et al. 2011 (New York); Virginia Division of Natural Heritage 2010 (Virginia). It also includes the results from species assessed as part of the current study (Sneddon et al. 2015).
Located in Research / … / Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts / Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion
File ECMAScript program Clark, J.S. et al. Climate change vulnerability of forest biodiversity: climate and competition tracking of demographic rates
by lesley_sneddon — published Sep 09, 2013 — last modified May 14, 2019 07:56 PM — filed under:
Author's Abstract Forest responses to climate change will depend on demographic impacts in the context of competition. Current models used to predict species responses, termed climate envelope models (CEMs), are controversial, because (i) calibration and prediction are based on correlations in space (CIS) between species abundance and climate, rather than responses to climate change over time (COT), and (ii) they omit competition. To determine the relative importance of COT, CIS, and competition for light, we applied a longitudinal analysis of 27 000 individual trees over 6–18 years subjected to experimental and natural variation in risk factors. Sensitivities and climate and resource tracking identify which species are vulnerable to these risk factors and in what ways. Results show that responses to COT differ from those predicted based on CIS. The most important impact is the effect of spring temperature on fecundity, rather than any input variable on growth or survival. Of secondary importance is growing season moisture. Species in the genera Pinus, Ulmus, Magnolia, and Fagus are particularly vulnerable to climate variation. However, the effect of competition on growth and mortality risk exceeds the effects of climate variation in space or time for most species. Because sensitivities to COT and competition are larger than CIS, current models miss the most important effects. By directly comparing sensitivity to climate in time and space, together with competition, the approach identifies which species are sensitive to climate change and why, including the heretofore overlooked impact on fecundity.
Located in LP Members / … / Project Documents / Literature
Climate Adaptation Fund Announce Latest round of Grantmaking
by Climate Adaptation Fund — published Mar 17, 2016 — filed under: , ,
Read the 2016 Request for Proposals, review the Applicant Guidance Document and submit a completed WCS Pre-proposal Application using our online application form no later than 5:00 PM EDT on Friday, April 8, 2016.
Located in News & Events
Climate Change
by Jean Brennan — published Dec 21, 2012 — last modified Aug 28, 2013 10:55 AM — filed under:
Located in Cooperative / Our Plan / Section 1: Biodiversity and Conservation Challenges Across the Appalachian Region
File Climate Change
by Matthew Cimitile — published Sep 11, 2013 — last modified Sep 11, 2013 09:51 AM — filed under: ,
2013 SN Portfolio: Mission to create an effective adaptation strategy for climate change based on the best available science.
Located in Cooperative / … / 2013 Science Needs Portfolio / PDF Thematic Areas
Climate Change Adaptation - TNC Florida
by Rhishja Cota — published Oct 31, 2022 — filed under: , , , , ,
We are using the Adaptation Workbook to consider climate change adaptation actions for four different preserves in Florida.
Located in News & Events
File Climate Change Adaptation Planning
by Bridgett Costanzo — published Oct 01, 2012 — filed under: , ,
Planning efforts completed or underway by Federal and State agencies and Tribes.
Located in Resources / General Resources Holdings / AppLCC Development and Operations Planning
Climate Change Hurts Indian Tribes Disproportionately, Report Finds
by Web Editor — published Mar 30, 2012 — filed under: ,
North American Indian Tribes are especially harmed by climate change, as more ecological shifts and more frequent, more extreme weather events occur, a new study concludes. Because Tribes are heavily dependent on natural resources, severe weather events like droughts, floods, wildfires, and snowstorms make tribal communities particularly vulnerable and impact American Indians and Alaska Natives more than they impact the general population.
Located in Resources / General Resources Holdings